Home: British Injustice

Please add details of corrupt judges you know below.

Our courts – the statutory or Admiralty ones, those in court buildings, are all illegal and corrupt. They are mostly administering EU law, which the British Constitution specifically outlawed: “The writ of no foreign potentate or state shall run in England.” (1698 Bill of Rights)

Common Law: All our courts are corrupt Admiralty law
If you are the victim of a court you will rightly feel you are living in a dictatorship.

The valid courts are the common law courts, which go back a thousand years. But with the fire of London and the plague, the courts decided to dispense with common law, and go with Admiralty Law. They passed the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666. An Admiralty court deals deals with ships, goods, property, the dead and their assets.

It cannot handle or prosecute living people, so they decreed we are all dead, or lost at sea. We are classed as things, or fictitious names, ie a legal fiction. That enabled them to seize all our assets, which they put in a trust owned by the government.

Yes, its all about profit. The fictitious name is your name, but at least part of it is in capitals. If you see a name in capitals in a court, its a fictitious name.

Your “normal,” Admiralty birth certificate, is a contract between you, your parents and the government, where they steal all your assets. But because they illegally conceal its purpose is theft, all court judgements on fictitious names are also illegal (because a contact has to be honest) and can be overturned. It is not normal for a court to do anything honest. Unfortunately the police illegally obey the statutory or Admiralty courts.

You can create a living birth certificate on www.commonlawcourt.com, click Deeds. Common law courts with a jury of 12 are superior to all other courts, including the Supreme court.

If you end up in court, DO NOT state your name and address. Say “I have a living common law birth certificate I would like the judge to read.” They should then dismiss the case; as an Admiralty court they can’t touch a living person. You can later say “I am a living man, John of the family Smith.” The police too will then accept this verdict.

You can also reclaim your property by reclaiming your dead entity, become the executor of your Cestui Que Vie trust, collapse it, forgive your debts, and remove yourself from the corruption of Admiralty law.

Most nations had common, Natural or Universal law, but nearly all, including The USA, Ireland and France, followed England in adopting Admiralty law (Napoleonic).

John Smith, with 18 years experience, is probably the leading advocate of common law in the UK. He has experience in all levels of court, including Judicial Review, the High Court on the Stand London, and the Supreme court in Parliament Square.

The government has abolished all degrees and A Levels in common Law and the British Constitution; they want us to forget we have rights.

If we went back to common law, we would have honest courts that did not persecute innocent people. Our freedom would be restored.

British Injustice
The inability for subjects to get justice creates untold trauma, which is why the government deliberately allows corruption. Corrupt judges are condemning victims without regard for the law, their human rights, or the damage they to their lives. There is a culture of delighting in cruelty.

Most judges are members of a Freemasonry secret society. All members of secret societies should be banned from all government positions. Judges will break the law where it would help the defendant. They particularly ignore the Lisbon Treaty and the ECHR articles 6 and 8. They will rule in favour of a CPS prosecutor who is obviously lying, and has no evidence, and destroy a defendant who has solid evidence who is obviously telling the truth.

Many of these corrupt judges are appointed by Ken Clark MP, the arch Remainer who favours the EU dictatorship.

There’s a book: The Most Corrupt British Judges: by Adoko. Although President of the Uganda Law Society, he felt it neccessary to write a book on corrupt British judges. Since it went into the EU, Britain has become a very corrupt nation. Most of the law judges sentence for is atrocious EU law. The Proceeds of Crime Act, 2003, where the judge, the CPS and the police split 50% of the proceeds between them, is an example of how the courts engage in criminality, by arresting innocent, well-to-do people, steal everything they possess, and put them in prison for 4-7 years.

Although junior judges are monitored, it is quite clear senior judges are allowed to be as corrupt as they like:

The Lord Chancellor (Lord Mackay of Clashfern) Hansard 16th Octorber 1996 – the position hasn’t changed today:

It is, however, important to ensure that we do not undermine the primary place within our constitution of the principle of judicial independence or our confidence that judges will determine each case fairly and on its own merits, without fear of reprisal or improper intervention. The independence of the judiciary, therefore, must connote not only independence from the executive but also that of one judge from another.

For these reasons, neither the Lord Chancellor nor any of the senior judges has any constitutional power to require one judge to report on another, or to offer appraisal or any other qualitative assessment of the judge’s performance as a judge. Neither is there any authority to require a judge to submit to such appraisal. The Lord Chancellor’s statutory powers to dismiss a judge, which in any event do not extend to the more senior judges, are also very narrowly drawn.

These important considerations make it inappropriate to introduce a formal system of appraisal. The Heads of Divisions, and Presiding and Resident Judges, however, do have responsibilities for the oversight of judicial business and they are able to assist judges informally where that appears likely to be helpful. It is a well understood role of the Leaders of the Circuits to draw to the attention of the Presiding and Resident Judges, as appropriate, concerns expressed by members of the Bar about the judiciary.




Join the Conversation


Leave a comment

Leave a Reply to admin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.